Utah News Dispatch
‘The water wars are coming’: Missouri looks to limit exports from rivers, lakes to other states
Missouri River and Capitol Building during sunset in Jefferson City. (Getty Images)
Missouri House members on Wednesday took a step toward prohibiting exports of water, arguing the state’s “most precious resource” should be protected and reserved for residents.
The bill, which prohibits water exports without a state permit, cleared an initial Missouri House vote 115-25. It needs second approval before it moves to the Missouri Senate, where a similar bill has passed a committee vote and awaits action by senators.
Speaking in favor of the bill, Bridget Walsh Moore, a Democrat from St. Louis, said “the water wars are coming.”
“The western water table is drying up,” Walsh Moore said. “This is forward thinking and protecting Missouri from future problems.”
With the Missouri River running through the middle of the state, the Mississippi along its eastern border and the Osage River that feeds the Lake of the Ozarks, Missouri is home to a host of reliable freshwater systems. But lawmakers fear as other states struggle with a drier future, they might look to Missouri as a solution.
To the west, Kansas is grappling with the decline of the Ogallala Aquifer, an underground supply of fresh water that has been over pumped for decades and threatens running dry. The changing climate and overuse threaten water supplies in much of the western U.S.
Republicans Sen. Jason Bean and Rep. Jamie Burger — from Holcomb and Benton, respectively — introduced legislation this year that would prohibit water exports from Missouri without a permit from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources.
The bill would prioritize Missouri users over requests from out of state. In order to receive an export permit, according to the bill, there would have to be enough water present and the out-of-state proposal could not interfere with existing or proposed uses within Missouri. The applicant would also have to demonstrate they need the water and intend to put it to good use.
Missouri officials would have to analyze whether existing and proposed water uses in Missouri would still have access to adequate supply before approving a water export.
Burger told The Independent earlier this year that he wasn’t aware of any efforts to export water from the state aside from some long standing agreements along the state’s borders with Arkansas and Oklahoma. As of last week, about one-third of Missouri is in a moderate or severe drought, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor.
Utah may be looking to other states for water
The Missouri water bill comes less than two months after the Utah Legislature passed what it called a “generational” water planning bill, which includes the possibility of looking to other states to try to meet Utah’s needs.
Missouri state Rep. Jamie Burger told the Missouri Independent that while he had read about several western states’ “water woes,” he was not aware of Utah’s legislation.
Asked about Missouri’s bill, Utah Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, pointed to the chance for collaboration in Utah’s SB211, titled Generational Water Infrastructure Amendments, which Gov. Spencer Cox has signed into law.
“We understand that water is important to every state. One of the reasons I ran the bill to create the Water Development Council and Utah Water Agent was to help break down roadblocks and provide more opportunities for us to collaborate across borders. I am confident that together, we will solve our state’s and others’ water issues,” Adams said.
Utah’s Water Development Council will be comprised of the four largest water districts in the state and the Utah Division of Water Resources. Meanwhile, the government-appointed state water agent will act as a liaison to coordinate with the council to make sure the state’s water needs are met.
Environmental and watchdog groups have criticized the Utah bill’s lack of transparency because both the newly created water council and water agent are exempted from state records laws. When it passed in February, the Great Basin Water Network called it a “dystopian bill to siphon water from other states.”
Utah News Dispatch reporter Kyle Dunphey contributed to this report.
Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com. Follow Missouri Independent on Facebook and Twitter.
The post ‘The water wars are coming’: Missouri looks to limit exports from rivers, lakes to other states appeared first on Utah News Dispatch.
